Welcome to Australia's only Vintage Radio and Television discussion forums. You are not logged in. Please log in below, apply for an account or retrieve your password.
Australian Vintage Radio Forums
  Home  ·  About Us  ·  Discussion Forums  ·  Glossary  ·  Outside Links  ·  Policies  ·  Services Directory  ·  Safety Warnings  ·  Tutorials

Tech Talk

Forum home - Go back to Tech talk

 HT for a 56 Chevy car radio
« Back · 1 · Next »
 Return to top of page · Post #: 1 · Written at 5:29:13 PM on 21 October 2013.
Redxm's avatar
 Location: Tamworth, NSW
 Member since 6 April 2012
 Member #: 1126
 Postcount: 466

I have been given a 56 Chevy car radio by a friend for restoration. The radio itself is in reasonable condition and should be OK after a recap etc.

However, these things had a 'power pack' mounted on the speaker frame. Of course this is missing. We don't like the chances of finding one in restorable order, as it took quite a few years to find the radio.

Looking at the circuit it needs 215v HT, which comes from the vibrator supply in the power pack.

Is it worth grabbing a low power inverter ( such as ebay item 200977034766 ) and having a go at adapting it for the HT supply??

The power pack also has a couple of 12V6 arranged in push-pull for the audio. I reckon I can come to some sort of solid state solution to this.

Or, am I wasting my time??


ben


 
 Return to top of page · Post #: 2 · Written at 5:49:37 PM on 21 October 2013.
Brad's avatar
 Administrator
 Location: Naremburn, NSW
 Member since 15 November 2005
 Member #: 1
 Postcount: 7395

Care should be taken with switchmode power supplies, including inverters. Despite them being packed with delicate components they can deliver a big wallop.

Also, the cheaper inverters do not deliver a sinewave but a stepped squarewave.


‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
A valve a day keeps the transistor away...

 
 Return to top of page · Post #: 3 · Written at 6:45:50 PM on 21 October 2013.
Simplex's Gravatar
 Location: Bathurst, NSW
 Member since 7 August 2008
 Member #: 336
 Postcount: 397

Think it would be a pretty formidable project to get that radio going.

Considering the missing power pack and audio output stage.

If you friend intends the radio for a restored Chevy the radio may end up as a non working display item.

On switch mode inverters, even the pure sine wave models can develop quite an amount of r.f hash.


 
 Return to top of page · Post #: 4 · Written at 7:25:14 PM on 21 October 2013.
Redxm's avatar
 Location: Tamworth, NSW
 Member since 6 April 2012
 Member #: 1126
 Postcount: 466

Yeah, noted re SMPS. I was intending to mount in a steel case/box. I guess the other option is to cobble together a vibrator supply, although they are not without RF issues either.

I love a challenge, but this may be a while in the making.........


 
 Return to top of page · Post #: 5 · Written at 8:04:55 PM on 21 October 2013.
Simplex's Gravatar
 Location: Bathurst, NSW
 Member since 7 August 2008
 Member #: 336
 Postcount: 397

Good luck with your endeavours whatever way you go, it will be a lot of work.

Yes a vibrator supply using a genuine vibrator would be a challenge.

Many a radio mechanic in the days gone by tore his hair out trying to cut out the hash.

Oddly enough, I found putting a 80μF electro across the battery supply where it entered the case of my Ferris M94 reduced the hash by quite a marked amount.


 
 Return to top of page · Post #: 6 · Written at 8:22:37 PM on 21 October 2013.
Marcc's avatar
 Location: Wangaratta, VIC
 Member since 21 February 2009
 Member #: 438
 Postcount: 5389

You could make the audio into a hybrid using an integrated circuit amp. It depends on how original you wish to go? You can use 6V tubes like 6AQ5 etc. and series the heaters. A bit of resistance may be in order as a generator / alternator will get the battery to 13.8 V +/-

Switch mode power supplies are dirty albeit more efficient due to their frequency. Solid state vibrators exist. Vibrators are around 150 Hz.+

The cheap and nasty solution would be to get a low power 12v to 240V inverter (some lights have these) and try it. Watch the fingers: bites.

Marc


 
 Return to top of page · Post #: 7 · Written at 8:51:33 AM on 22 October 2013.
Wa2ise's avatar
 Location: Oradell, US
 Member since 2 April 2010
 Member #: 643
 Postcount: 831

The cheap and nasty solution would be to get a low power 12v to 240V inverter (some lights have these) and try it.

These may not provide isolation from the DC input, if so, hopefully the positive HT inside is not the side tied to the input. Most modern inverters use a DC-DC converter (a switching power supply circuit), then switching FETs to create a "modified" sine wave output. Find and tap the HT DC ahead of these FETs. Scavenge from and use one of those 2 winding filter coils from a PC switching power supply to filter out the hash.


 
 Return to top of page · Post #: 8 · Written at 9:44:04 AM on 22 October 2013.
Marcc's avatar
 Location: Wangaratta, VIC
 Member since 21 February 2009
 Member #: 438
 Postcount: 5389

The big thing is that there are a variety of ways to get the B+. You may be able to find an inverter transformer. The only scrap one here in a chassis is 32V and it I believe is complete.

The heater tubes seem to behave well in the US transformerless radio's. The heaters are by their nature isolated from B+ and can be run on AC or DC.

There are monoblock IC's that will generate the pulse to drive a "ringing choke" & regulate it, but the damn things tend to be noisy. Catch 22 the higher the frequency the better the efficiency & the smaller the transformer.

It is quite easy to make an oscillator (555 NAND gates etc) and use that to drive a Mosfet. Silicon Chip has had a few projects with this sort of thing. Using a mains power transformer backwards will work but there is the current rating of the 240V winding & physical size.

The idea of the cheap / salvaged inverter is that they will have some form of step up that is actually a transformer.

B+ regulation can be achieved, if necessary using a shunted LR8.

Marc


 
 Return to top of page · Post #: 9 · Written at 12:48:40 PM on 22 October 2013.
Redxm's avatar
 Location: Tamworth, NSW
 Member since 6 April 2012
 Member #: 1126
 Postcount: 466

For $20 inc post I can buy the above mentioned ebay converter, I reckon its worth a look just to see.


 
 Return to top of page · Post #: 10 · Written at 8:32:37 PM on 22 October 2013.
Marcc's avatar
 Location: Wangaratta, VIC
 Member since 21 February 2009
 Member #: 438
 Postcount: 5389

This is very much along the lines I was thinking. Not worth spending a lot of money experimenting.

Do remember that if you rectify 240V AC, you do not get 240VDC: You get more (P. P. vs RMS)

Marc


 
 Return to top of page · Post #: 11 · Written at 9:27:08 AM on 23 October 2013.
Maven's Gravatar
 Location: Canberra, ACT
 Member since 23 August 2012
 Member #: 1208
 Postcount: 584

Given that rectified AC produces higher DC voltage, you might look at finding an inverter to produce 110 VAC and use a small step-up transformer before rectification and smoothing, to get DC as close as necessary to 215VDC. There are some multi-tap transformers that might offer a range to experiment with and keep the PSU linear. It's very hard to eliminate RFI from switchmode PSUs.

Maven


 
« Back · 1 · Next »
 You need to be a member to post comments on this forum.

Sign In

Username:
Password:
 Keep me logged in.
Do not tick box on a computer with public access.