AWA 500m low volume
|
« Back ·
1 ·
Next »
|
|
|
Location: Latham, ACT
Member since 21 February 2015
Member #: 1705
Postcount: 2174
|
I have checked all caps ( recapped) and resistors. I found a mica ( black AWA ) cap coming off the antenna coil that reads as .05μF! Would this result in low volume. I think it's supposed to be 100pf . I will have to get a photo as I can't remember where the other end terminates ( not to ground ) there are two on the Antenna coil but only one goes to ground.
|
|
|
|
Location: Latham, ACT
Member since 21 February 2015
Member #: 1705
Postcount: 2174
|
Ok I just found out it is actually a .05 but I'm sure I saw uμF printed on it so what's the chance it's turned into a resistor?
|
|
|
|
Location: Linton, VIC
Member since 30 December 2016
Member #: 2028
Postcount: 472
|
0.05μF seems too much capacitance for that end of town.
|
|
|
|
Location: Toongabbie, VIC
Member since 1 September 2020
Member #: 2438
Postcount: 138
|
This sounds like C5. This is the AGC decoupling cap connected to the secondary side of the antenna coil. Leaking here would cause inoperative AGC and possible distortion on strong signals. How are circuit voltages? They perform ok these models but not hot performers by any means.
|
|
|
|
Location: Linton, VIC
Member since 30 December 2016
Member #: 2028
Postcount: 472
|
If it is C5 it will not be a mica cap, probably wax. And it will not be hanging off the antenna coil but the coupling transformer from the antenna coil to the RF amp.
|
|
|
|
Location: Latham, ACT
Member since 21 February 2015
Member #: 1705
Postcount: 2174
|
Its actually C2. I pulled it out and photographed it . Blew it up and it reads 4pf but on the multimeter it read .05.
|
|
|
|
Location: Linton, VIC
Member since 30 December 2016
Member #: 2028
Postcount: 472
|
Picofarads are more like it for that end of town.
|
|
|
|
Location: Toongabbie, VIC
Member since 1 September 2020
Member #: 2438
Postcount: 138
|
C2 is unlikely to be faulty. You could just remove it and test the radio. It can be difficult testing caps that small.
|
|
|
|
Administrator
Location: Naremburn, NSW
Member since 15 November 2005
Member #: 1
Postcount: 7395
|
Photos uploaded to Post 6.
‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
A valve a day keeps the transistor away...
|
|
|
|
Location: Toongabbie, NSW
Member since 19 November 2015
Member #: 1828
Postcount: 1313
|
Back in those days the standard units were F(arad), μF and uuF.
Reference Radiotron Designers Handbook 1944.
pF had not been invented!
To me thats a 4pF capacitor.
Am I right or has maths defeated me again?
Fred.
|
|
|
|
Administrator
Location: Naremburn, NSW
Member since 15 November 2005
Member #: 1
Postcount: 7395
|
I think you are correct, Fred. The problem here stems from whoever set up the unit for capacitance in the first place and made the unit represent an unrealistic amount of capacitance, which is why the Farad is one of the few units in physics more commonly expressed in millionths (μF), billionths (nF) and trillionths (pF) of Farads instead of just Farads.
‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
A valve a day keeps the transistor away...
|
|
|
|
Location: Latham, ACT
Member since 21 February 2015
Member #: 1705
Postcount: 2174
|
We found the actual problem today. It was a 40k resistor on the screen that had gone high. Its now a very healthy set
|
|
« Back ·
1 ·
Next »
|
You need to be a member to post comments on this forum.
|