Welcome to Australia's only Vintage Radio and Television discussion forums. You are not logged in. Please log in below, apply for an account or retrieve your password.
Australian Vintage Radio Forums
  Home  ·  About Us  ·  Discussion Forums  ·  Glossary  ·  Outside Links  ·  Policies  ·  Services Directory  ·  Safety Warnings  ·  Tutorials

General Discussion

Forum home - Go back to General discussion

 Most Aussie radio stations stopped streaming
« Back · 1 · Next »
 Return to top of page · Post #: 1 · Written at 10:38:13 AM on 17 October 2013.
Wa2ise's avatar
 Location: Oradell, US
 Member since 2 April 2010
 Member #: 643
 Postcount: 830

Many stations quit streaming, and instead post a message like this:
"Due to a recent Federal Court ruling, streaming of this service over the Internet is no longer considered to be a simultaneous transmission of our radio broadcast.

As a consequence, there are now music licensing issues that prevent us from continuing to provide this stream"

4KQ still streams.


 
 Return to top of page · Post #: 2 · Written at 10:57:23 AM on 17 October 2013.
Brad's avatar
 Administrator
 Location: Naremburn, NSW
 Member since 15 November 2005
 Member #: 1
 Postcount: 7290

There would be some instances of where this is true in a technical sense although there is probably just some pressure from record companies to obstruct the online feeds as the sound can be captured on digital radios and recorded to a hard disc without any losses, making such recordings available for duplication and distribution illegally. It's what happens when the hundreds of music labels around the world become two or three giants - cartels are easier to form.

Some of the Sydney stations that offer online listening (listed by callsign) are: 2UE, 2GB, 2CH, 2BL, 2RN, 2PB, 2SM, 2KY, 2DAY, 2MMM, 2JJJ, 2UUS (2WS) and 2WFM (Mix 106.5). I haven't checked the feeds themselves though all the websites have a Listen Live link.


‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
A valve a day keeps the transistor away...

 
 Return to top of page · Post #: 3 · Written at 1:04:31 PM on 17 October 2013.
GTC's avatar
 GTC
 Location: Sydney, NSW
 Member since 28 January 2011
 Member #: 823
 Postcount: 6678

It's about licence definition and royalty payments:

In February, the High Court ruled that internet simulcasts did not meet the definition of a “broadcast” under the Copyright Act, and therefore not covered by the existing licences by radio stations across the country. An appeal by Commercial Radio Australia failed in August.

This meant that radio stations will need to have a separate licence in order to play music on any internet simulcast, and at market rates. Previously, radio broadcasters were able to use the “one percent cap” in the Copyright Act to minimise their royalty payments to just one percent of gross income.

“It confirms radio stations must pay a licence fee for streamed music and we hope to move quickly to work out a fair and proper licensing deal. We look forward to working with radio to establish equitable arrangements,” Dan Rosen, the head of the PPCA – the non-profit organisation tasked to collect royalties for artists – said when the appeal was rejected.

However, Grant Broadcasters took issue with the rates provided by PPCA – saying that they wanted regional broadcasters to pay the same rates as their metro counterparts.

“When we were presented with the licence for PPCA requirements, the rates and scales for stations operating in regional markets were exactly the same as those for metros,” Group Director of Programming and Content David Rodgerson told Radio Today.

“As a regional operator, Grant Broadcasters made the decision that it is beyond our market’s financial capacity to support and pay for the service.”

http://techgeek.com.au/2013/09/30/regional-radio-network-grant-broadcasters-axes-online-simulcasts-high-court-fee-ruling/


 
 Return to top of page · Post #: 4 · Written at 3:19:56 PM on 17 October 2013.
Brad's avatar
 Administrator
 Location: Naremburn, NSW
 Member since 15 November 2005
 Member #: 1
 Postcount: 7290

It seems like a situation that will be of benefit to stations like 2GB and 2UE as their programming is mainly talk-back and thus they are generating their own content. At the same time, by the High Court's ruling, would stations like these enforce the distinction of copyright on online audio feeds on their regional affiliates or just let it go?

I guess time will tell.

My definition of a broadcast is a transmission freely available to lots of people, as opposed to a subscription service being referred to as narrowcast like Foxtel and Optus pay TV services. With this it looks like barristers and judges see it differently.


‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
A valve a day keeps the transistor away...

 
 Return to top of page · Post #: 5 · Written at 5:12:16 PM on 17 October 2013.
Maven's Gravatar
 Location: Canberra, ACT
 Member since 23 August 2012
 Member #: 1208
 Postcount: 584

A "narrowcast" is defined in Australian law as needing a contract for service between narrowcaster and customer. There used to be a special category called "open narrowcast" for free services, such as those provided by non-profits. It was always a legal bunfight as to which category should apply and who needed what kind of licence.

The legal arguments about "simulcast" have revolved around the issues of storage and caching. Networks such as ABC and Fairfax routinely delay syndicated broadcasts for different timezones, and this is not considered "simulcast" under the law.

It's all a bit precious, since any digitised broadcast signal is going to be delayed by some period of time for caching in the AD-DA converters - DAB runs several seconds behind live AM/FM radio out of the same studio.

It's never the artists who push for royalties, because they know very well they won't get any better career publicity than broadcasting. It's the publishers, who usually start by screwing the artists, then turn their attention to screwing anybody else with music-related cash flow. There are some internet-only music subscription services now that do global deals with the music cartels, have no licence service obligations, and they are happy to see anything that makes life harder for the free-to-air broadcasters. You have to wonder if free music broadcasting has much of a future.

Maven


 
 Return to top of page · Post #: 6 · Written at 5:24:18 PM on 17 October 2013.
Brad's avatar
 Administrator
 Location: Naremburn, NSW
 Member since 15 November 2005
 Member #: 1
 Postcount: 7290

It's the publishers, who usually start by screwing the artists...

Yep, exactly.


‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
A valve a day keeps the transistor away...

 
 Return to top of page · Post #: 7 · Written at 9:29:05 AM on 27 October 2013.
Art's Gravatar
 Art
 Location: Somewhere, USA
 Member since 22 October 2013
 Member #: 1437
 Postcount: 896

Cable pay TV is quite a few seconds behind Satellite TV
offered by the same provider too, because the cable head
end gets it's signal from the same Satellite that the direct to
home sat boxes do, but the Cable head end has to retransmit
the signal to cable decoders in the home.





 
« Back · 1 · Next »
 You need to be a member to post comments on this forum.

Sign In

Username:
Password:
 Keep me logged in.
Do not tick box on a computer with public access.